Planar point-agent simulation

Solver reliability

Command feasibility and physical audits

Baseline retained. Uncertified steps fell from 29 to 0; three physical-audit failures remained.

Simulation episodes
896
448 old / revised pairs
Uncertified steps
29 → 0
Old projected → revised; study totals
Physical-audit failures
0 → 3
Old projected → revised; study totals
Paired seeds per case
16
28 condition / policy cases

Recorded evidence

Results

448 matched controller pairs across seven policies and four conditions.

Case 1 of 28nominal · adaptive_lloyd_bandit

16 paired seeds; means per episode, not totals.
MetricOld projectedRevisedRevised − old95% interval lower95% interval upper
Uncertified steps / episode00000
Physical-audit failures / episode00000
Optimizer failures / episode00000
Recovered commands / episode00000
Observed area fraction0.4196170.419617000
Map RMSE0.3626360.362636000
Squared-speed energy proxy3.259193.25919000
Case notes & acceptance

Safety gate: True. Progress/cost gate: True.

null = missing or not applicable, never zero. Intervals and sample sizes are reported in each table. Scroll tables horizontally to see every column.

Methods & interpretation

Zero collisions is not a pass: three tiny actuator-acceleration excesses remain physical-audit failures, and frontier progress/cost gates fail. The primary baseline is old projected, not repulsion. Hardening v2 rechecked saved finite commands; it did not rerun these episodes or measure new runtime. Descriptive Student-t intervals within this condition/policy; no multiplicity correction or optimality proof.